![]() But what do I know they have billions of dollars I have hundreds, they look much smarter than me from a $ view anyway. Personally I prefer new stuff requiring new OS and not the old OS, but it would be Oh so much better a place to be if they would quit releasing a new OS every 12 months and just fix the current one and add features to it after they do. If we would all drink the Apple Kool-Aid and use a Mac mini for open directory to run your corporation identity management system and let iCloud connect all your devices and not worry about security settings, I am sure everything would be oh so much better :) Or from MS standpoint if we would all run windows then office would be what its supposed to be. So, they only put in just enough effort on enterprise as somebody like Microsoft does on making Office be a really good product on the Mac its not their bread and butter and if its good enough people will use it. Internet restores are still pretty painfully slow.īelieve me, I'd love to get away from imaging as a whole and just use the OS they ship with, and I fully expect we will get there, but so far what we've seen is that, at least in our case, its only trading one issue for another.Īnd just remember however important we think we are, we are probably less that 5% of Apple sales. Then there is the issue of "re-images" which means we likely still need a base OS. We use that in a custom user setup process, so if we just took 10.10.3 and ran with it, a lot of remote users receiving Macs would have been dead in the water. The next point release could cause incompatibility issues with these apps, and the vendors aren't exactly super quick on updating their wares, which makes matters worse.Īnother perfect example is the createmobileaccount binary getting busted with 10.10.3. If you have a number of more, ahem, 'complicated' applications and tools, like AV software (MCAfee AV/Firewall), virtualization, VPN (An圜onnect for example) and other stuff like that which is mandated by the org or environment and which our users rely on daily, it means we can't just blindly accept whatever OS Apple decides to shove down our throats. If the stable of apps and tools you need on your Mac's is small or very basic, then yeah, it can work great. I hope you can get it to work.I love the idea behind the no-imaging workflow and have been pushing for it more and more here, but unfortunately, its still a little simplistic to just assume it will always work correctly. I have a lot of time invested in my older setup which I still use once in a while so I wanted the older software to work too. Good luck! Hope you can get it all working. I use the Pod HD500 Editor for my HD500 (again not at the same time as the old Line 6 Edit) - my newer rig is a DT25,HD500, and JTV69 We will also update the JAVAHOME environment. How to install Java JDK (Java Development kit 12) on Mac OS. The Line 6 Editor works fine also once Java is installed. The Apple Java for OS X 2012-006 1.0 update for Mac OS X 10.7, 10.8 operating systems delivers improved security, reliability, and compatibility by uninstalling the Apple-provided Java applet plug. Java ia also required for Line 6 Edit software if you have an older Pod and need it - I have a Pod XT Live that I have gigged with for years along with my Variax 500. You should then be able to Install the older Workbench software and it should then work with Yosemite. ![]() Go to Apple's web site and find this file - JavaForOSX2014-001.dmg - install it ![]() Note: You cannot run both versions of Workbench at the same time. I use Workbench HD with the JTV and the old Workbench software with my Variax 500 I have a Mac Pro in my Studio with Yosemite as well. Apple no longer includes it with their OS releases. You need to install Java on your system with Yosemite.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |